<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check your facts before blogging from the hip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html</link>
	<description>Public relations, social media and word of mouth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/comment-page-1#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=459#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You can print a picture with an appeal for information no worries but once any arrest or charges are made, then it has to come off to gaurd against contempt. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can say someone has been murdered or that someone is being sought in connection with a murder, but that must be changed, once someone has been charged/arrested to something much more safe - the defendant may claim it was natural causes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I haven&#039;t read the various other blogs about this but my opinion was very much that Jackie&#039;s original post was an appeal for information. Yes she makes a connection between the man in the picture and her ordeal but my experience and instinct tells me she would not be troubled if called upon to defend a libel action.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And sometimes, in my experience anyway, you can make an informed decision - just how likely is this libel action and hey, shall I go ahead anyway?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In this case, the chances of the libel action are small indeed, I would say and all sorts of factors about the man in the picture&#039;s reputation could come into play. Who knows? I for one am willing to take such a risk to say to a woman who reports that she has been attacked while others did nothing, to say, do you know what? Some of us do give a sh*t.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can print a picture with an appeal for information no worries but once any arrest or charges are made, then it has to come off to gaurd against contempt. </p>
<p>You can say someone has been murdered or that someone is being sought in connection with a murder, but that must be changed, once someone has been charged/arrested to something much more safe &#8211; the defendant may claim it was natural causes.</p>
<p>I haven&#39;t read the various other blogs about this but my opinion was very much that Jackie&#39;s original post was an appeal for information. Yes she makes a connection between the man in the picture and her ordeal but my experience and instinct tells me she would not be troubled if called upon to defend a libel action.</p>
<p>And sometimes, in my experience anyway, you can make an informed decision &#8211; just how likely is this libel action and hey, shall I go ahead anyway?</p>
<p>In this case, the chances of the libel action are small indeed, I would say and all sorts of factors about the man in the picture&#39;s reputation could come into play. Who knows? I for one am willing to take such a risk to say to a woman who reports that she has been attacked while others did nothing, to say, do you know what? Some of us do give a sh*t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/comment-page-1#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=459#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The reservations I have about your post, and others like it Stuart, aren&#039;t to do with the veracity or otherwise of the allegation. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know whether it&#039;s true but even if I witnessed it and was a 25-year friend of the person involved, I still think we need to be more aware of the consequences of publishing - whether that&#039;s on a blog or anywhere else. (isn&#039;t the definition of publishing for legal purposes anything that could be read by a third party?)  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s remind ourselves that this person hasn&#039;t been convicted of an offence, and my recollection of media law is that until that&#039;s the case, you don&#039;t go printing a picture or article that assumes someone&#039;s guilt - it prejudices any subsequent legal actions and if that person was found not guilty, I think they might be within their rights to sue you and anyone else who posted their picture with an assumption of guilt... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sure there are people who&#039;ve done law more recently than me, but I fear you&#039;re on dangerous ground. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reservations I have about your post, and others like it Stuart, aren&#39;t to do with the veracity or otherwise of the allegation. </p>
<p>I don&#39;t know whether it&#39;s true but even if I witnessed it and was a 25-year friend of the person involved, I still think we need to be more aware of the consequences of publishing &#8211; whether that&#39;s on a blog or anywhere else. (isn&#39;t the definition of publishing for legal purposes anything that could be read by a third party?)  </p>
<p>Let&#39;s remind ourselves that this person hasn&#39;t been convicted of an offence, and my recollection of media law is that until that&#39;s the case, you don&#39;t go printing a picture or article that assumes someone&#39;s guilt &#8211; it prejudices any subsequent legal actions and if that person was found not guilty, I think they might be within their rights to sue you and anyone else who posted their picture with an assumption of guilt&#8230; </p>
<p>Sure there are people who&#39;ve done law more recently than me, but I fear you&#39;re on dangerous ground. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Danicki</title>
		<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/comment-page-1#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Danicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=459#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;NB I have yet to hear from the investigating officer, as promised, but this incident happened on a Friday at about 1PM (I was not seen by a BTP officer for nearly two hours after I reported the incident at Piccadilly Circus - *after* I&#039;d walked away and called my partner, who advised me to go to the police, something which had not occurred to me). I am not sure whether I should have expected to hear anything on a Saturday, but I have not. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NB I have yet to hear from the investigating officer, as promised, but this incident happened on a Friday at about 1PM (I was not seen by a BTP officer for nearly two hours after I reported the incident at Piccadilly Circus &#8211; *after* I&#39;d walked away and called my partner, who advised me to go to the police, something which had not occurred to me). I am not sure whether I should have expected to hear anything on a Saturday, but I have not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Danicki</title>
		<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/comment-page-1#comment-1149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Danicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 01:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=459#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously, anyone who wants to check whether a complaint was made needs to call the British Transport Police and give the specifics about location, timing, etc that I gave in my post. I can understand someone who does not know me doubting my story, but doubting those who *do* know me (Jim Treacher, a friend of more than three years, for example) is sort of...weird. I think Philip&#039;s instincts are sound, but he is ignoring the way that credibility is earned in our online world - that is to say, not as easily as he seems to assume. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, anyone who wants to check whether a complaint was made needs to call the British Transport Police and give the specifics about location, timing, etc that I gave in my post. I can understand someone who does not know me doubting my story, but doubting those who *do* know me (Jim Treacher, a friend of more than three years, for example) is sort of&#8230;weird. I think Philip&#39;s instincts are sound, but he is ignoring the way that credibility is earned in our online world &#8211; that is to say, not as easily as he seems to assume. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://stuartbruce.biz/2006/11/check_your_fact.html/comment-page-1#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=459#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Stuart - pin the rap on me why don&#039;t you! &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously, I thought long and hard about publishing a post too. In the end it came down to whether I thought that Jackie was telling the truth. I have known her for a number of years and although I disagree with her on many things, she is as honest as the day is long. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;She suffered an assault and wants it sorting. I chose to help her. You did to. It was a judgement call but then again like most things in life, it usually comes down to that. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Resigning from government was a judgement call too. My motives were the same as yours even though you disagreed with me on the decision.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Stuart &#8211; pin the rap on me why don&#39;t you! </p>
<p>Seriously, I thought long and hard about publishing a post too. In the end it came down to whether I thought that Jackie was telling the truth. I have known her for a number of years and although I disagree with her on many things, she is as honest as the day is long. </p>
<p>She suffered an assault and wants it sorting. I chose to help her. You did to. It was a judgement call but then again like most things in life, it usually comes down to that. </p>
<p>Resigning from government was a judgement call too. My motives were the same as yours even though you disagreed with me on the decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

