Comments on: Friction.TV wants your opinion http://stuartbruce.biz/2007/02/frictiontv_want.html Public relations, corporate communications and social media Tue, 22 May 2012 07:48:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: reg pyzer http://stuartbruce.biz/2007/02/frictiontv_want.html/comment-page-1#comment-983 reg pyzer Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:42:15 +0000 http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=395#comment-983 <p>I agree completely, the heirarchy of frictiontv is very economical with its provision of informaion regarding its founding members, even direct questions draws forth little response. Any company director in the UK has to submit far more personal information than an individuals name.<br /> Every contributor to friction.tv has to provide their own personal email address before being allowed to contribute, which is fine, but this is also an identifying piece of data, which seems contrary to friction.tv's idealology. Maybe if your input does not suit the politics of the undisclosed directors/shareholders of friction.tv your comments are thwarted. ie, bypassed to another window not disclosing up to date information, of course this is only conjecture but friction.tv's lack of structural information makes this a possibilty. Also the time it takes to gain accesss to friction.tv's site compared to other websites makes an indvidual wary of being screened plus bookmarkings keep dropping making navigation more difficult and time consuming having waited long periods of time to access a particular debate.</p> I agree completely, the heirarchy of frictiontv is very economical with its provision of informaion regarding its founding members, even direct questions draws forth little response. Any company director in the UK has to submit far more personal information than an individuals name.
Every contributor to friction.tv has to provide their own personal email address before being allowed to contribute, which is fine, but this is also an identifying piece of data, which seems contrary to friction.tv's idealology. Maybe if your input does not suit the politics of the undisclosed directors/shareholders of friction.tv your comments are thwarted. ie, bypassed to another window not disclosing up to date information, of course this is only conjecture but friction.tv's lack of structural information makes this a possibilty. Also the time it takes to gain accesss to friction.tv's site compared to other websites makes an indvidual wary of being screened plus bookmarkings keep dropping making navigation more difficult and time consuming having waited long periods of time to access a particular debate.

]]> By: Rebecca http://stuartbruce.biz/2007/02/frictiontv_want.html/comment-page-1#comment-982 Rebecca Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:53:55 +0000 http://www.stuartbruce.eu/?p=395#comment-982 <p>Hi Stuart,</p> <p>Thanks for posting about Friction.TV. You raise some good points, just to let you know we launched on Feb 12th and are currently finalising the legal info.</p> <p>Looking forward to seeing you on the site :)</p> Hi Stuart,

Thanks for posting about Friction.TV. You raise some good points, just to let you know we launched on Feb 12th and are currently finalising the legal info.

Looking forward to seeing you on the site :)

]]>